Libby Bevin

SOC 2 vs. PCI Compliance: What’s the Difference?

Libby Bevin · November 22, 2023 ·

Inherent Risk vs. Control Risk: What’s the Difference?

Any company that processes or stores personal consumer data has likely encountered the System and Organization Controls Report (SOC 2), formerly known as Service Organization Controls, and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).

These two sets of requirements can appear similar at first glance, but several key differences set the two apart.

Neither standard is required by law, but non-compliance with either one has considerable consequences. For example, if your business isn’t PCI DSS-compliant, you run the risk of having your credit card processing privileges revoked.

A company without an up-to-date SOC 2 report might lose business to rivals that can demonstrate that their customer data is safe, which a SOC 2 report helps to do.

It’s essential for your company to understand the differences between these two standards and to know which aspects of each are required for your overall risk management.

So, what’s the difference between SOC 2 and PCI DSS compliance?

What Is a SOC 2?

SOC 2 reports are comprehensive reviews of your organization’s data security controls according to standards determined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). There are several kinds of SOC reports—most notably SOC 1 and SOC 3, which use the same trust services criteria as SOC 2. The SOC 2, however, contains more sensitive data and is meant to be confidential; SOC 3 reports are designed to be certified and shared.

The trust services criteria of the SOC 2 are derived from five fundamental principles:

Security: All procedures and security controls included in an organization’s defense against data breaches should be effective and tested regularly.
Availability: Systems and information should be accessible to staff and clients in accordance with the company’s purpose and goals.
Processing Integrity: System processing must meet the company’s and user entities’ objectives while remaining accurate and efficient.
Confidentiality: Any confidential information should be appropriately shielded from access by unauthorized parties.
Privacy: Any information connected to an individual’s identity should be stored and disposed of securely.

Security is the most important of these principles; the rest can be examined case by case. While preparing for a SOC audit, companies should consider which principles matter most to their clientele. Ask yourself if non-compliance with each principle would harm the relationship with your client. If so, that principle must be addressed in the SOC 2 audit.

What Is the PCI DSS?

The major credit card providers developed the PCI DSS to protect cardholder data from companies that process credit card information. There are 12 primary PCI compliance requirements. Those prior requirements are divided into 281 sub-requirements, which may or may not apply to an organization based on the volume of transactions it performs annually and how those transactions are processed.

Companies must validate their compliance with PCI DSS to process transactions, and any part of their network that is found not to be PCI compliant in the event of a breach could lead to heavy monetary penalties.

What’s the Difference Between PCI DSS and SOC 2?

The primary difference between PCI DSS and SOC 2 is that the former only applies to businesses that process payment card data; the latter applies to any company that processes or stores personal consumer information. So, some overlap exists between the two standards, but SOC 2 applies to more organizations than PCI DSS.

Another difference is the kind of professional allowed to conduct each audit. SOC 2 examinations can only be performed by CPA firms. At the same time, PCI DSS compliance is proven by either an audit from a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) or a Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). PCI DSS assessments must also be accompanied by an attestation from the bank that performs the company’s financial transactions.

Finally, SOC 2 allows much more flexibility in adhering to its trust service principles. A company striving to meet SOC 2 compliance standards can tailor its business and security strategies to meet its specific needs—for example, by choosing which of the five trust service principles to include in a SOC 2 audit.

In contrast, the PCI DSS standard is far more prescriptive about what a business must do to secure payment card transactions. Future PCI DSS updates might offer some new flexibility but are far from what the SOC 2 standard allows.

Similarities Between PCI and SOC 2 Compliance

The PCI and SOC standards are two of the most important in the financial services sector. These two sets of regulations share many similarities in that they both strive to protect customers against theft, fraud, and other unlawful actions.

The PCI and SOC 2 standards demand an annual evaluation of the controls to assure compliance. These evaluations must be carried out by a certified third-party auditor approved by the relevant regulating authority.

Risk analysis, vulnerability scanning, testing, and remediation are all included in the PCI and SOC 2 compliance audits. However, the scope of each audit varies greatly.

For example, the PCI audit simply evaluates the technical components of the organization’s infrastructure; instead, the SOC 2 audit covers all of the organization’s business processes and procedures.

Implementing the Right Compliance Standards for Your Business

Whether your organization must comply with SOC 2 or PCI DSS requirements—or both—it is necessary to analyze the criteria that must be met. These rules were implemented to safeguard all parties and guarantee that your firm provides the most significant security feasible for your client’s sensitive data.

SOC 2 and PCI DSS are distinct standards that apply to various enterprises. SOC 2 reports follow the AICPA’s Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE 18) and apply to organizations that hold, store or process customer data.

In contrast, PCI DSS is a standard administered by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) and applies to organizations that accept, store, process, or transmit cardholder data.

Maintain Compliance with PCI and SOC 2 with Help from ZenGRC

Data security must be integrated into all elements of your organization, regardless of regulatory restrictions. Even though most consumer legal requirements do not address data privacy, you progressively exchange data with other parties to improve asset performance.

Our compliance software, ZenGRC, provides a solid basis for Corporate compliance. It also allows you to follow the evolution of your program over time to ensure compliance and prevent non-compliance sanctions.

Stakeholders, personnel, and compliance managers can gain access to a central source of truth for all of your current and future PCI requirements with ZenGRC.

ZenGRC’s intuitive dashboards show you what threats must be mitigated at a glance, manage procedures, collect and store documents required during audits, and much more.

Request a demo today to learn how ZenGRC can assist your PCI compliance program.

What is ISO 19011?

Libby Bevin · November 22, 2023 ·

ISO 19011 is a set of guidelines for auditing management systems. It is an international standard to help organizations perform these audits.

ISO 19011 is designed to advise organizations on preparing audit programs for auditing their management systems, such as environmental, risk, and quality management systems.

However, ISO 19011 is not a set of requirements that a company has to follow step by step, as an organization can’t become ISO 19011 certified. Instead, an organization should adopt ISO 19011 guidance as appropriate to suit the specific needs and requirements of the particular audit program.

ISO 19011 differs from the ISO 9001 international standard that specifies requirements for quality management systems in that ISO 9001 is the only standard in the ISO 9000 series to which organizations can certify.

What is the purpose of ISO 19011?

ISO 19011 serves as a fundamental guidepost, establishing standardized practices for efficient and systematic audit processes within management systems. It doesn’t just outline a set of rules but provides a structured framework enabling organizations to build robust auditing methodologies.

This international standard empowers organizations to plan, execute, and manage audits precisely and objectively. It becomes a cornerstone for organizations aiming to assess and enhance their management systems, aligning with different ISO standards such as ISO 9001 (Quality Management System), ISO 14001 (Environmental Management System), and ISO 31000 (Risk Management System), among others.

The multifaceted nature of ISO 19011 stretches across diverse facets, including audit planning, setting audit objectives, compiling audit reports, and evaluating auditors’ competence. It emphasizes the criticality of a risk-based approach, aligning audit activities to organizational goals while fostering continual improvement.

Notably, ISO 19011 caters to internal and external audits, ensuring that audit programs adhere to international standards and promote ongoing enhancement of management systems. This standard serves as a guidepost, promoting compliance and a culture of excellence and adaptation within organizations.

What is the latest version of ISO 19011?

In its ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) defines an audit as “[the] systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining objective evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.”

That means that an auditor or audit team looks at what a company is doing, collects evidence, and compares that evidence to the controls the organization is supposed to be doing.

In terms of ISO standards, there are two main types of ISO audits:

Internal audits (first-party audits )
External audits (second-party and third-party audits)

ISO 19011, which specializes in first-party and second-party audits, targets individual and larger audit teams conducting comprehensive enterprise audits.

The company itself conducts internal audits. These internal audits generally focus on evaluating effectiveness, determining conformity, and identifying areas that you can improve. Although a company may do a first-party audit to prepare for a third-party audit, a first-party audit never results in an ISO certification.

External audits include second-party and third-party audits. A second-party audit is performed at a customer’s request (or a company contracted to act on the customer’s behalf) on a supplier of products or services.

An independent organization with no vested or conflict of interest in the company audited, such as those organizations that provide certification, can conduct the third-party audit.

ISO 19011 contains three important sections about auditing management systems:

How to manage an audit program
The seven principles of auditing
Approaches for evaluating the competence of auditors

ISO 19011 also focuses on applying the principles of continuous improvement to an audit program. These include ensuring that the audit program’s objectives align with the main goals of the business and that the needs and best interests of customers and other stakeholders are prioritized.

What is the difference between ISO 9001 and 19011?

ISO 9001 and ISO 19011 significantly contribute to organizational management in distinct ways. Understanding their varying scopes and applications is crucial:

	ISO 19011:2018	ISO 9001:2015
Name	Quality Management Systems – Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems	Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Latest Version	2018	2015
Content	Guides evaluating existing management systems and establishing effective audit programs.	Outlines requirements and best practices for building a Quality Management System (QMS).
Purpose	Guides organizations in assessing management system performance and facilitating improvement.	Sets standards for quality metrics and processes in organizational outputs.
Best Used for	Implementing best practices in creating robust auditing systems.	Establishing and maintaining ISO-certified quality systems.
Certifiable?	No	Yes

While ISO 19011 focuses on guiding organizations in evaluating their management systems and enhancing audit methodologies without providing certification criteria, ISO 9001 specifically delineates requirements and best practices necessary for certification in Quality Management Systems.

These standards are complementary in that ISO 9001 provides the foundation for building a QMS, while ISO 19011 aids in ensuring the efficacy and continual improvement of these management systems through effective auditing practices.

7 Principles of ISO 19011 Auditing

ISO 19011 introduces seven foundational principles that underpin effective auditing within management systems:

Integrity: Auditors must exemplify honesty and fairness throughout the audit process, ensuring transparent and ethical practices.
Fair Presentation: Emphasizing objectivity and impartiality in presenting audit findings and conclusions, maintaining neutrality in assessments.
Due Professional Care: Conducting audits with precision, diligence, and thoroughness, adhering to high ISO 9001 standards of professionalism.
Confidentiality: Upholding acquired audit information’s confidentiality ensures sensitive data remains secure and protected.
Independence: Maintaining an unbiased stance during audits, avoiding conflicts of interest to ensure impartial ISO 9001 evaluations.
Evidence-Based Approach: Relying on factual evidence to substantiate audit conclusions, ensuring assessment credibility and reliability.
Risk-Based Approach: Identifying and evaluating ISO 9001 risks to effectively allocate audit resources and efforts.

Following these principles ensures auditors undergo proper ISO 9001 training and evaluation to perform different audits competently throughout the management system life cycle.

This enables the identification of nonconformities, implementation of corrective actions, and overall ISO 9001 management systems improvement. Adhering to ISO 19011:2018, whether conducting first-party, second-party, or third-party audits, is critical for auditors to effectively assess management system standards like ISO 9001 or ISO 45001.

Best practices for ISO incident management

ISO 19011:2018 encourages effective incident management within the auditing process approach for quality management systems like ISO 9001. Following ISO auditing principles and Annex A guidelines, best practices include:

Robust Incident Recording: Establishing clear protocols aligned with ISO 9001 standards for recording and documenting incidents during on-site internal audits and external audits. This ensures proper information security.
Thorough Analysis: Conducting in-depth investigations following ISO 9001 guidelines to understand the root causes of incidents. Lead auditors should oversee this process.
Corrective Actions: Implementing timely and appropriate ISO 9001-aligned corrective measures to address identified issues. These actions should align with continual improvement objectives.
Continuous Improvement: Emphasizing a culture of continual improvement by learning from incidents and integrating lessons into future ISO 9001 audit programs and procedures. This should involve proper auditor training and evaluation.

Following these best practices for auditing management systems enables organizations to enhance incident management through rigorous ISO 9001 protocols. Robust incident handling is critical for successful internal and external audits and quality management system improvement.

ZenGRC: The key to successful ISO 19011 audits

Implementing ZenGRC elevates an organization’s capacity to conduct impactful ISO 19011 audits.

Experience centralized audit management through ZenGRC’s integrated platform. This single source of truth for audit programs and findings enhances coordination and traceability for auditors and management.

Real-time dashboards within ZenGRC empower proactive compliance monitoring aligned with ISO 19011 principles. Identify and mitigate issues preemptively, preventing escalations and non-conformities.

Ready to elevate your auditing capabilities with ZenGRC? Get Started with ZenGRC and revolutionize your ISO 19011 audits today.

What Does a SOC 2 Report Cover?

Libby Bevin · November 22, 2023 ·

Information security is front of mind for most companies today, as data breaches are increasingly common. According to IBM and Ponemon Institute study, The global average cost of a data breach in 2023 was USD 4.45 million, a 15% increase over three years.

In this high-risk climate, potential clients seek confirmation that they can rely on you to protect their sensitive data. A SOC 2 Type II report is one of the finest methods to offer this assurance.

What is SOC 2?

SOC 2, or the System and Organization Controls for Service Organizations 2, is the framework that determines an organization’s ability to protect personal information and customer data.

The SOC 2 developer, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), created the framework in response to the accelerated cybersecurity risks due to technological advances in data security and data processing.

How Does SOC 2 Differ From ISO 27001?

While SOC 2 is a standard form of information security compliance, ISO 27001 is another framework that governs IT risk. ISO, developed by the International Organization for Standardization, contains numerous standards that govern risk assessment processes and security policies.

ISO 27001 is a more rigorous form of compliance, but by achieving ISO compliance, your organization shouldn’t have trouble gaining SOC 2 attestation as well. The ISO framework helps organizations establish an Information Security Management System (ISMS), a process that can often take up to three years to develop.

Even though ISO 27001 is a more rigorous set of standards, it can still be helpful for an organization to seek SOC 2 compliance because of some significant differences.

What are Other Versions of SOC Compliance?

While SOC 2 primarily focuses on controls around the five Trust Services Criteria, SOC 1 and SOC 3 deal with different areas of an organization’s business procedures.

SOC 1 is concerned with internal controls dealing with financial reporting, while SOC 3 shares an identical set of reporting standards as SOC 2. However, SOC 3 reports are publicly available to anyone, while SOC 2 is confidentially shared only with stakeholders and industry regulators.

Why Seek SOC 2 Compliance?

Cloud computing has revolutionized how many companies conduct business. While it’s led to groundbreaking advances in how service providers operate, it’s also led to security issues around customer and client data. SOC 2 compliance helps assure stakeholders that your organization follows regulatory standards for information security and processing.

How Does a Company Gain SOC 2 Attestation?

To attain a clean SOC 2 report, a company must have a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) attest that security measures are in place.

There are two types of SOC 2 reports: Type I and Type II. Type I SOC 2 must show that internal controls are in place and designed effectively. Type II requires that a company establish its controls are in place and have been operating effectively over a period of time.

Once a company’s senior management has decided that internal controls are in place to meet the required SOC 2 criteria, a CPA firm will then conduct a SOC audit to confirm or deny that the company has achieved full compliance.

Defining the Scope of the SOC 2 Type 2 Report

Once an organization passes its audit, it receives a SOC report outlining how its internal controls demonstrate its ability to provide its service securely.

Each SOC 2 report will be unique to an organization and vary depending on which of the five Trust Services Principles are assessed through the audit. The five criteria include security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, and privacy.

Your organization’s functions will help determine which of the five criteria apply. Then, internal controls will be assessed to ensure your organization’s policies and procedures help maintain the relevant trust criteria.

The SOC 2 report structure consists of an opinion letter from the auditor, management’s assertion of compliance, the description of the system being reviewed, and the description of tests of controls and the results of that testing.

What is the Difference Between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2?

A SOC 2 Type 1 report details your internal control rules and their fit for purpose at a specific time. On the other hand, a SOC 2 Type 2 report tests such systems over time (usually six months).

Both evaluations need the creation of system descriptions, control mapping, research, and the performance of risk assessments for each area. Then, in a SOC 2 Type 2 examination, auditors do fieldwork for weeks or months to examine controls, pick samples, and test procedures.

How Much Does a SOC 2 Audit Cost?

The typical SOC 2 Type II auditing costs between $10,000 and $60,000. The cost will be determined by factors such as:

The number of Trust Service Criteria that apply
Your control environment’s size and complexity
The number of applications in scope
The total number of workers and physical locations audited
The degree of assistance required throughout

When you factor in preparation, the cost of time and resources is significant. SOC 2 assessments can also have hidden expenses, such as completing a readiness assessment, repairing security vulnerabilities with new tools and solutions, and training employees on new rules.

These expenses repeat since SOC 2 Type 2 assessments must be done annually. Beginning with a readiness assessment and documenting processes can help you save money.

How to Prepare for Your SOC 2 Audit

To ease the SOC 2 audit process, organizations aiming for SOC 2 audit and evaluation should have a solid security program with organizational and technical protections in place. Well-prepared organizations will face less scrutiny and acquire SOC 2 certification much faster.

When preparing for a SOC 2 audit, organizations should keep the following best practices in mind:

Create Up-to-date Administrative Policies

Administrative policies and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are essential for any security program. Teams should develop administrative procedures appropriate for their personnel organization, technology, and daily workflow. These rules must be written in straightforward language so they can be understood by your employees rather than as formal paperwork.

Security policies should specify how security measures are deployed throughout your apps and infrastructure and the general methods for managing workplace security.

Once your team has implemented administrative policies, review them regularly and update them when processes change. As proof of your security program, teams can share security rules with SOC 2 auditors.

Set Technical Security Controls

Following your team’s development of administrative security rules, you must strive to ensure that technical security controls are in place throughout your apps and infrastructure. This implies that your team should put cloud security rules that correspond to your policy in place.

Teams should consider building security rules and adopting solutions that revolve around the following:

Access Control
Firewall and Networking
Encryption
Backup
Audit Logging
Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)
Vulnerability Scanning

Gather Documentation and Evidence

To ensure a smooth audit process, your team should compile all necessary materials, evidence, and paperwork before arranging a SOC 2 audit. Teams should collect the following documents:

Certifications and Agreements for Cloud/Infrastructure: Gather any agreements, certifications, and attestations relating to cloud and infrastructure, including papers such as:
- Report on SOC 2 Compliance
- Business Associates Agreement (BAA)
- Service Level Agreements (SLA)
Administrative Security Policies: Gather and distribute all policies on your security program.
Documentation of Technical Security Measures: Gather any evidence and documentation related to the deployment and administration of infrastructure security measures.
Contracts with Third Parties and Vendors: Gather documents related to third-party firms, contractors, and service providers.
Risk Assessment and Audit paperwork: Gather and share any existing paperwork from past security assessments or create new material.

Schedule an Audit with A Reputable Auditing Firm

After your team has built your security program and prepared for a SOC 2 assessment, it is time to work with a trustworthy auditing company. Teams should search for a company that has worked with organizations of comparable size, has performed SOC 2 audits, and has the security skills to conduct a reasonable SOC 2 audit process.

How Long is a SOC 2 Type 2 Report Valid for?

The SOC 2 report is valid for one year after its release date. Any more than a year old report gets “stale” and has little value to potential buyers.

As a result, the golden rule is to have a SOC audit performed every 12 months.

However, the yearly audit norm is not set in stone. You can do the audit as frequently as you make significant changes to the control environment. For example, if your service business is concerned about cybersecurity controls, you may have SOC 2 Type II audits done every two years.

Remember that your consumers are paying attention to how regularly you schedule SOC 2 reports. Any inconsistency in scheduling might indicate a lack of commitment to SOC 2 compliance.

Meet Your SOC 2 Compliance Goals with ZenGRC

Obtaining a SOC 2 report is time-consuming yet vital for any service organization that relies on cloud computing. By establishing strong internal controls and using a SOC 2 framework as a guide for developing safe business policies, your organization can operate confidently in an increasingly digital age.

By eliminating laborious manual processes, streamlining onboarding, and keeping you updated on the progress and effectiveness of your programs, ZenGRC, a compliance and audit management system, offers a quicker and more seamless path to compliance.

ZenGRC gives you the visibility you need to assess the progress and performance of your compliance initiatives and their impact on risk reduction. An audit overview report describes the frameworks, requirements, and controls under consideration, the actions to be completed, and the current audit status.

With seamless connections with platform tools, you get a single, real-time picture of risk and compliance, offering the context-specific perspective required to make intelligent, strategic decisions that keep your firm secure and win the trust of your customers, partners, and workers.

An automated and integrated reference database will help you stay ahead of the ever-changing regulatory environment. RiskOptics enables you to:

Become audit-ready in less than 30 minutes
Reduce staff workloads through collaboration and automated workflows.
Learn how to allocate resources by understanding the impact of compliance actions on your cyber risk posture.

Schedule a demo today to learn how ZenGRC can streamline your audit process.

What is PCI SAQ?

Libby Bevin · November 22, 2023 ·

The PCI Data Security Standard Self-Assessment Questionnaire (PCI SAQ) is a crucial tool in the arsenal of merchants and service providers navigating the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) compliance landscape and ensuring information security. The PCI SAQ is more than just a compliance checklist; it’s a comprehensive self-evaluation framework enabling businesses to assess, affirm, and enhance their data security measures. Designed to cater to various transaction environments, it plays a pivotal role in safeguarding cardholder data, effectively helping prevent data breaches from the ground up.

In this blog, we’ll explore how the PCI SAQ empowers merchants and service providers to proactively address security vulnerabilities. Additionally, we will guide you through the process of determining your eligibility and selecting the right SAQ for your organization, a crucial step often facilitated by consulting with your acquiring bank or payment brand. Understanding and completing the PCI SAQ is a vital step in fortifying your defenses against data breaches and ensuring a secure transaction environment for your customers.

What is a PCI SAQ?

The PCI Data Security Standard Self-Assessment Questionnaire (PCI SAQ) is a validation tool designed for merchants and service providers that are permitted to self-evaluate their compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). A PCI-validated P2PE solution is a combination of secure devices, applications, and processes that encrypt credit card data immediately upon swipe or dip in the payment terminal.

PCI SAQ helps service providers and payment processors better protect cardholder data by completing the self-assessment which can prevent data breaches before they happen. Merchants are encouraged to contact their bank or payment brand for eligibility requirements to identify the appropriate SAQ level for their organization.

What are the benefits of a PCI SAQ?

The PCI Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) offers several benefits to merchants and service providers handling cardholder data. These advantages are integral to not only achieving compliance with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) but also enhancing overall security posture. Key benefits include:

Simplified Compliance Process: The SAQ provides a streamlined approach for smaller merchants and service providers to assess and document their PCI DSS compliance. This self-assessment is less complex than a full-scale PCI DSS audit, making it more accessible for smaller businesses.
Identification of Security Gaps: Completing the SAQ helps organizations identify areas where their data security practices may be lacking. This proactive identification allows businesses to address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited by cyber threats.
Customized to Business Needs: There are different versions of the SAQ tailored to various types of payment processing environments. This customization ensures that businesses focus only on the requirements relevant to their specific transaction processes, making the assessment more relevant and efficient.
Cost-Effective: For many small to medium-sized businesses, conducting a full PCI DSS audit can be cost-prohibitive. The SAQ offers a more cost-effective alternative for demonstrating compliance and ensuring the security of cardholder data.
Enhanced Security Awareness: The process of completing the SAQ can increase awareness and understanding of payment card security within the organization. It encourages best practices and can foster a culture of security among employees.
Maintains Customer Trust: By complying with PCI DSS through the SAQ, businesses demonstrate their commitment to protecting customer data. This commitment can enhance customer trust and confidence, which is vital in today’s digital transaction environment.
Reduces Risk of Data Breaches: By adhering to the standards outlined in the SAQ, businesses can significantly reduce their risk of data breaches and the associated financial and reputational damages.
Supports Overall Compliance Efforts: The SAQ can be a stepping stone for broader compliance efforts, providing a structured approach to data security that can be built upon as businesses grow and their compliance requirements evolve.

8 SAQ Validation Types for PCI DSS

There are eight SAQ validation types, or SAQ types, in PCI DSS v3.2.1:

SAQ Validation Type A (SAQ A)

Merchants that have fully outsourced all cardholder data functions to a PCI DSS-validated third-party service provider and do not electronically store, process, or transmit cardholder data from the merchant. SAQ A only applies to card-not-present merchants and is not available for face to face channels.

SAQ Validation Type A-EP (SAQ A-EP)

An E-commerce merchant that has outsourced all payment processing to a PCI-compliant processor and doesn’t directly receive cardholder data on their website. SAQ A-EP eligible merchants forward payment entry to a third-party site that is PCI DSS validated and is only applicable to e-commerce channels.

SAQ Validation Type B (SAQ B)

Merchants that only use imprint machines or standalone dial-out terminals for credit cards and do not store cardholder data qualify for SAQ B, but they cannot be e-commerce. Imprint machines take a physical credit card and multi-page receipts with ink between the pages to capture an image of the card. This process is made possible by the raised numbers and letters on the credit card.

SAQ Validation Type B-IP (SAQ B-IP)

To qualify for SAQ B-IP, the merchant must use a PTS-approved payment terminal with an IP connection. The terminal cannot store cardholder data and is only applicable to non-e-commerce merchants. An example of a PTS-approved terminal would be a Verifone vx520.

SAQ Validation Type C (SAQ C)

SAQ C applies to merchants that have a payment application system connected to the internet that doesn’t store cardholder data. PCI Security Standards Council (SSC) maintains a list of approved and validated payment applications that meet specific guidelines for secure credit card processing.

SAQ Validation Type C-VT (SAQ C-VT)

Merchants that qualify for SAQ C-VT are ones that manually key in single transactions via a keyboard that connects to an internet-based virtual terminal solution. The solution needs to be provided by a PCI DSS-validated service provider and no electronic cardholder data may be stored. SAQ C-VT doesn’t apply if the merchant is e-commerce.

SAQ Validation Type P2PE-HW (SAQ P2PE-HW)

One of the more common merchant solutions that can self-assess via the questionnaire are merchants that only use a hardware payment terminal. The terminal must be managed and validated by a PCI SSC listed point-to-point encryption (P2PE) solution provider and cannot store cardholder data. Since it is a hardware on-premises (“on prem”) solution, it would not apply to e-commerce.

SAQ Validation Type D (SAQ D)

Merchants and service providers that don’t fit into any of the pre-defined SAQs A thru P2PE-HW and are still eligible to complete an SAQ fall under SAQ D.

PCI SAQ Summary

The primary goal of completing the PCI SAQ is to obtain an Attestation of Compliance (AoC). While the attestation doesn’t grant the merchant PCI compliance , it proves that cardholder data is not at risk via electronic data sources or retention. Many of the SAQ options rely on a validated PCI DSS service provider that processes the transaction and, in turn, may store the information for various purposes. In a sense, the merchants that qualify for self-assessment are outsourcing the risk of accepting, transmitting, and processing payment cards to a third party service provider.

How often do you need to fill out the PCI SAQ?

Fulfilling the requirements of the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) is an ongoing process, and part of this commitment involves regularly completing the PCI Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). Typically, merchants and service providers are required to complete the SAQ annually. This frequency ensures that businesses continually assess and update their security practices in line with the latest PCI DSS standards and address any changes in their payment processing environments. However, it’s important to note that if a business undergoes significant changes in its payment systems or processes, it may be prudent to complete a new SAQ to reflect these changes more immediately. Additionally, compliance requirements can vary depending on the merchant’s acquiring bank or payment brands they work with, so it’s essential to stay informed about any specific guidelines or deadlines provided by these entities.

Choosing the SAQ That’s Right for Your Needs

Selecting the appropriate PCI SAQ is crucial for accurately assessing your business’s compliance with PCI DSS. The right SAQ depends on how your business handles cardholder data and the specific payment environments you operate in. There are several versions of the SAQ, each designed for different types of payment processing scenarios:

SAQ A: For merchants that outsource all cardholder data functions to PCI DSS compliant third-party service providers and have no electronic storage, processing, or transmission of any cardholder data.
SAQ A-EP: For e-commerce merchants who outsource all payment processing to PCI DSS validated third parties and have no electronic storage of cardholder data, but some elements of the payment process are handled on their website.
SAQ B: For merchants using only imprint machines and/or standalone, dial-out terminals, with no electronic cardholder data storage.
SAQ B-IP: For merchants using only standalone, PTS-approved payment terminals with an IP connection to the payment processor, without electronic cardholder data storage.
SAQ C: For merchants with payment application systems connected to the Internet, no electronic cardholder data storage.
SAQ C-VT: For merchants who manually enter a single transaction at a time via a keyboard into an Internet-based virtual terminal solution.
SAQ D for Merchants / Service Providers: For all other merchants and all service providers defined by a payment brand as eligible to complete an SAQ.

Understanding your payment processing activities is essential in choosing the correct SAQ. It’s advisable to consult with your acquiring bank or a qualified security assessor (QSA) to ensure you select the SAQ that best fits your business’s specific needs and payment environments.

Meet Your PCI Compliance Goals with ZenGRC

Navigating the complex landscape of PCI compliance can be a daunting task for any organization, but ZenGRC simplifies this journey with its comprehensive and user-friendly solution. ZenGRC is designed to streamline your PCI compliance process, offering tools and resources tailored to meet your specific needs. Whether you’re starting your compliance journey or looking to enhance existing practices, ZenGRC provides an intuitive platform to manage all aspects of PCI DSS requirements.

From assisting in identifying which Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) is appropriate for your business to tracking and managing the implementation of required controls, ZenGRC ensures you are always on top of your compliance status. The platform’s robust reporting capabilities allow for effortless demonstration of compliance to stakeholders, while its automated workflows significantly reduce the administrative burden, making the compliance process more efficient. By integrating ZenGRC into your PCI compliance strategy, you can focus more on your core business operations, confident in the knowledge that your compliance goals are being met with a reliable, efficient, and comprehensive approach.

Start Closing Control Gaps, Not Just Finding Them

Get a Demo

What is HIPAA?

Libby Bevin · November 22, 2023 ·

HIPAA, or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, represents a crucial cornerstone in the safeguarding of patient health information. This act not only offers robust security provisions and ensures the privacy of patients’ medical data but has also evolved to address the modern challenges of the digital age. With the advent of cyberattacks targeting health insurers and care providers, HIPAA has been instrumental in implementing preventive measures to protect against digital data breaches, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of health information in an increasingly connected world.

What is HIPAA?

HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, is a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that revolutionized the privacy and security of health information. Passed in 1996, this act establishes national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient’s consent or knowledge. HIPAA applies to a wide range of entities, including health care providers, health plans, health care clearinghouses, and business associates of these entities that handle health information.

Central to HIPAA are two key components: the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule. The Privacy Rule sets the standards for the protection of individuals’ medical records and other personal health information, both in paper and electronic forms – essentially the disclosure of PHI (private health information). It gives patients rights over their health information, including rights to examine and obtain a copy of their health records and request corrections. The Security Rule, on the other hand, specifies a series of administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for entities to use to assure the confidentiality, integrity, and security of electronic protected health information (ePHI).

Furthermore, HIPAA has been amended over the years to keep pace with the changes in the healthcare industry, particularly the shift towards electronic health records and the increasing concerns about data breaches and cyber threats. The HITECH Act and the Omnibus Rule have expanded the responsibilities of business associates and increased the penalties for HIPAA non-compliance.

In essence, HIPAA plays a critical role in protecting individual health information, ensuring it’s handled with the utmost confidentiality and security. This protection fosters trust in the healthcare system and encourages individuals to seek the care they need with the assurance that their personal health information remains private and secure.

What does HIPAA protect?

HIPAA offers several key protections for individuals’ health information, primarily focusing on safeguarding the privacy and security of sensitive health data. Here’s what it covers:

Privacy of Health Information: HIPAA establishes national standards to protect individuals’ medical records and other personal health information. It restricts how health information can be used and disclosed, ensuring that it’s not improperly shared without the patient’s consent or knowledge.
Security of Electronic Health Records: With the rise of digital health records, HIPAA sets standards for protecting the security of electronic health information. This includes requirements for physical, administrative, and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and security of electronic medical information.
Patient Rights Over Health Information: HIPAA grants patients several rights concerning their health information. This includes the right to inspect and obtain a copy of their health records, request corrections, and be informed about how their information is used and shared.
Breach Notification: In the event of a breach of unsecured protected health information, HIPAA requires covered entities and their business associates to provide notification of the breach to affected individuals, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and in some cases, the media.
Limitations on Health Information Use for Marketing and Fundraising: HIPAA places restrictions on how health information can be used for marketing, fundraising activities, and certain other purposes without the individual’s explicit permission.
Safeguards Against Genetic Discrimination: HIPAA, in conjunction with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), offers protections against discrimination in health coverage or employment based on genetic information.
Protections for Special Categories of Information: HIPAA offers additional protections for specific types of sensitive information, like mental health records, ensuring higher confidentiality and discretion in handling such data.

In essence, HIPAA’s role is to ensure that individuals’ health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide high-quality health care and protect the public’s health and well-being.

HIPAA Titles & Regulations

Title I: Health Insurance Reform Under HIPAA Title I of HIPAA safeguards health insurance coverage for individuals during job transitions or job loss. It notably prevents group health plans from denying coverage based on specific diseases or pre-existing conditions and eliminates the imposition of lifetime coverage caps. This ensures continuous health insurance protection for individuals in various employment situations.

Title II: Administrative Simplification Title II mandates the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to set nationwide standards for electronic healthcare transactions. This title is pivotal in promoting the efficiency of healthcare services through digital means. It emphasizes the need for secure electronic handling of health data and adherence to stringent privacy regulations, thereby enhancing the confidentiality and security of patient information in the digital landscape.

Title III: Tax-Related Health Provisions In Title III, the focus shifts to the interplay between healthcare and taxation. It outlines specific tax deductions for medical insurance and includes various tax-related policies and rules pertaining to medical care. This section integrates healthcare policy with tax legislation, offering financial implications for healthcare expenses and insurance.

Title IV: Enforcement of Group Health Plan Requirements Title IV expands on health insurance reforms, particularly emphasizing the rights and protections for individuals with pre-existing conditions and those seeking continuity in their healthcare coverage. It builds upon the groundwork laid in Title I, delving deeper into the specifics of insurance policies and coverage mandates.

Title V: Revenue Offsets The final title, Title V, addresses broader financial and tax implications. It concerns the regulations for company-owned life insurance and outlines tax consequences for individuals relinquishing U.S. citizenship. While indirectly connected to healthcare, this title highlights the far-reaching impact of HIPAA in financial and legal realms beyond traditional health insurance and care.

HIPAA Compliance: Title II

HIPAA compliance is most commonly associated with the mandates of Title II, which is divided into five pivotal rules, each addressing a different aspect of health information security and privacy:

The Unique Identifiers Rule (National Provider Identifier): This rule mandates that all healthcare entities, including employers, individuals, healthcare providers, and health plans, must use a unique 10-digit National Provider Identifier (NPI). This standardized identification system enhances the efficiency and accuracy of healthcare data processing.
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: As the cornerstone of patient data protection, the HIPAA Privacy Rule sets national standards for safeguarding personal health information. It limits the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI), balancing patient privacy with the necessity of sharing information for billing and healthcare operations. This rule applies to covered entities like health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers, and extends to business associates through contractual safeguards. The Privacy Rule also mandates comprehensive administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to maintain the privacy of PHI.
Transactions and Code Sets Rule: This rule advocates for the uniform use of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in healthcare transactions, particularly for insurance claims processing. It standardizes the electronic exchange of healthcare data, promoting efficiency and accuracy in billing and record-keeping.
The HIPAA Security Rule: Focused on electronic health records, the Security Rule prescribes national standards for securing electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI). It requires the implementation of robust physical and electronic measures to ensure the secure creation, transmission, and storage of ePHI, addressing a range of potential security risks.
The Enforcement Rule: This rule outlines the procedures for investigating HIPAA non-compliance and establishes the framework for imposing civil monetary penalties for HIPAA violations. It underscores the importance of adherence to HIPAA standards and the consequences of non-compliance.

HIPAA Omnibus Rule

In 2009, guidelines were established by HHS concerning the responsibilities of business associates of covered entities. These rules are contained in the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. This act was modified and expanded in 2013 as the HIPAA omnibus rule. Penalties range from $10,000 per violation to $50,000 per violation based on a tiered structure. The annual maximum penalty is $1.5 million.

Office of Civil Rights Enforcement

The Office of Civil Rights (OCR) enforces the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules in several ways:

by investigating complaints filed with it,
conducting compliance reviews to determine if covered entities and business associates are in compliance, and
performing education and outreach to foster compliance with the Rules’ requirements.

OCR also works in conjunction with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to refer possible criminal violations of HIPAA.

What is the penalty for HIPAA violations?

HIPAA violations are taken very seriously due to the sensitive nature of the data involved. The penalties for these violations vary based on the nature and extent of the breach, and the harm caused by it. They can range from minor fines to criminal charges, depending on the severity and intent behind the violation.

Monetary Penalties: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has established a tiered penalty structure for HIPAA violations. The penalties are classified based on the knowledge the entity had of the violation:

Tier 1: For violations where the offender didn’t realize they violated the Act and would have handled the matter differently if they had, the penalties range from $100 to $50,000 per violation, with an annual maximum of $1.5 million.
Tier 2: If the violation had a reasonable cause and was not due to willful neglect, the fines range from $1,000 to $50,000 per violation, with the same annual maximum.
Tier 3: For cases of willful neglect where an attempt to correct the violation was made, the penalty ranges from $10,000 to $50,000 per violation, subject to the annual cap.
Tier 4: If the violation was due to willful neglect and was not corrected, the fines start at $50,000 per violation, with the annual maximum still in place.

Criminal Charges: In more severe cases, particularly where there was intentional disclosure or obtaining of health information for personal gain, malicious harm, or deceit, criminal charges can be filed. These charges can lead to substantial fines and even imprisonment. For instance, knowingly obtaining or disclosing protected health information can result in fines up to $50,000 and one year in prison. Offenses committed under false pretenses carry higher penalties, and if committed with the intent to sell, transfer, or use for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm, the fines can go up to $250,000 with imprisonment of up to ten years.

Corrective Actions and Resolution Agreements: In some cases, instead of or in addition to monetary penalties, the HHS may require entities to undertake corrective actions to remedy the violation. This may include steps like improving data security, providing additional training to staff, or making changes to policies and procedures. Resolution agreements may also be signed, which include a detailed action plan and regular reporting to HHS to ensure compliance.

Civil Lawsuits: While HIPAA itself doesn’t provide a private cause of action, individuals affected by a breach may file civil lawsuits based on state privacy laws. Damages awarded in such cases can include compensation for harm suffered due to the breach.

The penalties for HIPAA violations drive home the importance of complying with the regulations to protect patients’ health information. Organizations and individuals handling health information are thus strongly advised to understand and adhere to HIPAA requirements to avoid these significant penalties.

Meet Your HIPAA Compliance Goals with ZenGRC

ZenGRC offers a streamlined and efficient solution for meeting your HIPAA compliance goals. This software simplifies the compliance process by providing a centralized platform for managing all your HIPAA-related requirements. With its user-friendly interface and comprehensive tracking tools, ZenGRC ensures that you stay on top of necessary audits, risk assessments, and policy management. It automates the tracking of compliance tasks and deadlines, reducing the risk of human error and ensuring timely completion. By choosing ZenGRC, healthcare providers and associated entities can confidently navigate the complexities of HIPAA compliance, focusing more on patient care and less on administrative burdens.